I Don’t Have Enough Faith To Be An Atheist: A Review

The year was 2010. I had accepted God’s call to the ministry. I was young, loved Jesus, and knew I needed an education. About five months prior, I started my first semester of Bible college. I didn’t know what Christian apologetics was. I just knew the course sounded interesting. In this course, I was introduced to a book that changed my life.

That book was I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist. It sought to present a case for the truth of the Christian faith by arguing twelve points. I was hooked and it changed how I think about my faith and evangelism.

Meet the Authors

Coauthored by Dr. Norman L. Geisler and Dr. Frank Turek, I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist seeks to argue that it takes greater faith to be an atheist than it does to be a theist. Their collaboration marries deep theological understanding with a pragmatic approach to faith and skepticism. In this book, they’ve laid out a blueprint arguing for the existence of a theistic God through a methodical examination of facts and theories.

Dr. Norman L. Geisler, who passed away in 2019, was a prolific author, theologian, and philosopher. He earned his Ph.D. in philosophy from Loyola University and was a co-founder of both Veritas International University and Southern Evangelical Seminary. Geisler’s work has been shaping Christian apologetics for decades; his extensive writing and teaching have left a profound impact on how people of faith articulate and defend their beliefs.

Dr. Frank Turek is a dynamic speaker and author recognized for his straightforward approach to defending Christianity. Holding a master’s degree from George Washington University and a doctorate from Southern Evangelical Seminary, Turek has a knack for translating complex theological and philosophical concepts into accessible language. His engagement through debates, radio, and television has brought apologetics into a wider public discourse.

While their collaboration on I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist leverages their individual expertise, it’s also fueled by a shared commitment to answer deep existential questions. Their book is as much an expression of this commitment as it is a result of their extensive academic and practical apologetics work.

This book invites readers on a journey to discover faith and consider the book’s arguments critically. I will delve into how Geisler and Turek present a compelling case for theism, examining the structured progression of their argument, which challenges readers to consider both the necessity and the substance of faith in the God of the Bible.

A Summary of Key Concepts

In I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, you’ll find a carefully structured argument, methodically leading readers from doubt to conviction. Norman L. Geisler and Frank Turek craft an argument that aims to reason and demonstrate the logical necessity of theism. They do a remarkable job of balancing their case for theism and addressing the objections to their case. To appreciate the book’s message, we’ll summarize the core concepts and how they unfold through the chapters.

The book’s thesis is both provocative and straightforward: it takes more faith to be an atheist than to believe in God. This bold claim is dissected through the lens of science, history, and philosophy, as Geisler and Turek examine the evidence for a divine creator. They present a twelve-point argument beginning with the existence of objective truth and concluding that the Bible is the Word of God and everything opposed to it is false.

Readers are invited to explore fundamental questions about the universe’s origin, moral absolutes, and the historical validity of the Bible. The authors deploy a host of arguments – cosmological, teleological, moral, and ontological – each intended to nudge the skeptic towards a theistic conclusion. This is not a book you breeze through; it implores you to pause, ponder, and process each claim in the journey from skepticism to belief.

In structuring the book, Geisler and Turek create a cumulative case for theism. Each chapter builds upon the previous, forming a mosaic of interconnected evidence. They delve into the complexity of living organisms, the precision of cosmic constants, the existence of objective moral values, and the reliability of gospel accounts, arguing these phenomena not just suggest, but insist on a divine architect.

The presentation of the book’s arguments respects your intelligence, expecting a level of engagement appropriate to the weighty subject matter. The final chapters confront the biggest question of all: if God exists, has He revealed Himself to humanity? This sets the stage for a critical discussion on the person of Jesus Christ and the authenticity of His claims, influencing the subsequent discourse on faith and knowledge that we will engage with in the next section.

The Strength of the Argument: Engaging with the Book’s Core Ideas

In I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, Geisler and Turek set forth a series of arguments that aim to demonstrate the logical necessity of theism. Their case builds from foundational philosophical queries to specific Christian claims, laying out what they consider to be a universal truth that transcends individual belief systems.

The authors present a variety of evidence across multiple disciplines to support their stance. For example, they delve into scientific discussions about the origin of the universe, bringing forth arguments in favor of a created cosmos. They draw on philosophical reasoning, like the moral argument for God’s existence, and even incorporate historical evidence pointing to the reliability of biblical text, particularly concerning the life and resurrection of Jesus Christ.

Their critique of atheism is direct. Geisler and Turek challenge the view that atheism is the default ‘rational’ perspective, questioning the sufficiency of materialism to explain reality’s complexity. Moreover, they invite readers to consider the implications of a universe without a divine moral lawgiver and the consequences that might have on human morality and justice.

The book has undoubtedly left a significant mark on theological and apologetic discourse. Supporters have celebrated it for providing a comprehensive, accessible case for Christian theism, while critics have raised questions about the interpretation of evidence and the strength of philosophical arguments. Both responses indicate that I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist manages to stir the pot of ideological confrontation—encouraging a deeper examination of personal convictions.

Following this analysis, the next section will evaluate how I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist aligns or clashes with today’s diverse landscape of belief, skepticism, and the search for truth.

Reflecting on Relevance: The Book in Today’s Context

As I close the last page of I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, I reflect on how this book stacks up against today’s ever-changing conversations around faith. The dialogue around theism and atheism is ever-evolving, yet Norman Geisler and Frank Turek’s arguments continue to reverberate, underscoring their staying power within apologetic circles.

Books like this always trigger a myriad of counterpoints and detailed response pieces. Critics of I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist tackle the authors’ methodology, the philosophical underpinnings, and the empirical evidence cited. Readers need to weigh these counterarguments with an open mind, to foster a well-rounded understanding of the contents.

Such explorations into the realm of belief, skepticism, and evidence play a significant role in personal development and societal norms. It’s not solely about the end conclusion—whether one agrees with Geisler and Turek or not—but about engaging in the process of critical thinking, asking tough questions, and seeking verifiable truth. This book acts as a catalyst for such discussions.

Ultimately, I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist, much like any work that digs into contentious themes, is more than a compilation of arguments. It’s a conversation starter, a grounding point for further exploration, and an invitation to an ongoing debate that shapes both individual perspectives and broader cultural dialogue. In a world often polarized by beliefs, taking the time to understand such texts can bridge gaps and enlighten paths, regardless of where one stands on the spectrum of faith. For me, it served as an introduction to the world of Christian apologetics and helped establish the reasons why I believe Christianity is true. It is a resource that I have consulted frequently since I first read it many years ago.

Have you ever doubted your faith? Did you know that there are strong reasons for believing the truth of Christianity? Would you like to learn more about refining your worldview or the realm of Christian apologetics? This book is for you! Just click or tap below to order your copy.

I Don’t Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist By Norman L. Geisler & Frank Turek / Crossway

Here’s a little transparency: Our website contains affiliate links. This means if you click and make a purchase, we may receive a small commission. Don’t worry, there’s no extra cost to you. It’s a simple way you can support our mission to bring you quality content.